Pro for demanding high power applications like flashes, powerful flashlights, toy RC cars and similar, and the regular ones for low power applications like remote controls, wireless keyboards/mouses, handheld GPS units or anything else low in power consumption.40 Funny Doodles For Cat Lovers and Your Cat Crazy Lady FriendĦ0 Quotes On Cheating Boyfriend And Lying Husbandġ20 Free Airport WiFi Passwords From Around The WorldĤ Ways To Boost And Optimize Wireless WiFi Signal Strength And SpeedĦ Virtual SIM Phone Number App For iOS And Android SmartphonesĦ Best VPN for Gaming – No Lags, 0% Packet Loss and Reduce Ping msħ Free Apps To Find, Spy And Track Stolen Android Smartphoneġ0 Best Free WordPress Hosting With Own Domain And Secure Securityġ0 GPS Tracker For Smartphones In Locating Missing, Abducted And Kidnapped Childħ Laptop Theft Recovering Software with GPS Location Tracking and Sp圜amĭownload the New Norton Antivirus, Internet Security The regular ones have a lot lower self discharge though, and will keep most of their charge when stored for a long time, whereas the Pro will lose their charge much faster when stored. In fact, my bicycle light warns for low battery after just a few minutes at full power with the regular eneloops, but not with the Pros. This will definetely result in better performance for demanding high current applications. I have measured them under a 1A load, and the Pro batteries (4 in a series for a total voltage of 4.8V) kept their voltage about 1V higher. All others ~fast discharge (when on tablet) are in the garbage actually.Īctually the Eneloop Pro batteries is able to keep voltage up a lot better under load than the regular Eneloop. I bought more than 50 NiMH batteries in the last 10 years and the only ones which survive many years where the slow discharge batteries like Eneloop and Some Duracell (Does Ladda is in the same class ?). But I would prefer an article that would add a lots more details like the number of charge-discharge supported, the time the battery will take to discharge or reach (say 1.0 volt), etc. To best of this article is that it unveil to me Ikea batteries. When I read comments, Like said in the article, comments tends to say that Laddda is a better value for very similar product. But a lots of peoples will take for granted that LADDA batteries are better than Eneloop Pro batteries. It clearly said that it show a clear winner only for this quick test. I'm really disapointed about this article. Assuming the two sets are capable of powering a similar number of flashes, however, the faster recycling speed and one-third cost of IKEA's batteries make them the clear winner in this comparison. Looking at each battery model's specs, the Eneloop Pros ($21 per AA 4-pack) boast a 2550mAh rating, while the Ikea LADDA ($7 per AA 4-pack) have a slightly lower 2450mAh capacity. The one caveat is that this is a test of recycle speed only-as Cheung explains in the video, he did not test the number of flashes the batteries are capable of powering. The test was performed using both flashes, meaning the batteries were swapped to the opposite unit for retesting to ensure the difference wasn't due to the hardware rather than the energy cells. The results are surprising: the LADDA batteries actually demonstrated a noticeably faster recycle speed versus the Eneloop Pros. Putting that notion to the test is Martin Cheung, who recently published a video in which he tests the recycle speeds of inexpensive rechargeable IKEA LADDA batteries against more expensive Panasonic Eneloop Pro batteries using Godox TT685 flashes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |